Anti-Porn British MP Wants to Regulate Internet Because Baby Boomer Women Don’t Want Men Reminded of Competition

Posted on December 21, 2010

0


It’s obvious to every red-blooded male that the reason why cowardly “conservative” male politicians speak out against things like pornography or “mail order brides” (which don’t really exist – Russian women, for instance, aren’t desperate) or in favor of raising the age of consent (21 anyone?) or criminalizing males for soliciting sex, is because many insecure Baby Boomer women don’t want men either reminded of the competition or able to exercise options for communication or contact with the competition.

You can bet your bank account that, when sexbots start to seriously look and feel like 18 year old women, legislatures around the world will make them illegal.

But why are there actual “males” who would agree with the older feminist and social conservative women regarding their desire to block men from having sexual options?

The answer can be found in this new post by the Chateau du Roissy: Most men “cash in their chips” at some point in their pursuit of the best possible female companionship. The reason why they cash in their sexual chips is because they’ve come to the conclusion that dumping their current female companion would result in their being alone for too great a period of time and possibly never getting anyone better than what they’ve already got on a permanent basis. To dump the current companion and take a chance on getting someone better would be characterized as “going all in” as opposed to “cashing in the chips” (sticking with the woman you have).

Like in poker, “going all in” can result in your whole life coming crashing down around you. For brave risk-takers, however, it can mean getting out of life what you want to get.

Many men who’ve “cashed in their chips” don’t want the cognitive dissonance that comes from being reminded of the options and potential opportunities that might have been achieved if they were brave and went “all in”. This is why they end up totally agreeing with the older insecure women who want to regulate all men’s sexual options.

These men don’t want to be reminded of their options anymore than their female partners want them to be so reminded.

Often such men will claim that they want men regulated because they themselves have daughters who need to be protected. These are the kind of men who think it was cool that a deranged German father recently castrated an older man for having a friendship with his daughter, who was above the age of consent in Niedersachsen. They will be the first to lie by saying their opposition to porn, etc, is because they want to “protect children”.

Such liars who want to regulate other men (or maim them) need to be taken behind the barn and shot. Castrating them wouldn’t bother them because they’ve already been castrated (many of this kind quickly opt for radical prostate surgery just because their PSA levels are a little high).

Politically these pathetic manginas can be either far left (feminist supporting) or far right social conservatives (White Knighters like the outgoing Senator Sam Brownback of Kansas).

Advertisements